I was disappointed in Tom Brokaw’s recent broadcast about us Baby Boomers. He stated we are “unrealized” particularly in comparison to our parents, the “Greatest Generation”.
In many ways he is correct: we have not achieved world peace, true equality of the genders or races, eradicated poverty, nor lived more spiritual, unmaterialistic lives. Though relatively less important, it is remarkable that the attitude towards marijuana is just beginning to change.
But we did raise our children to be truly color-blind, not at all homophobic and free of gender-role expectations while the Greatest Generation remains somewhat racist, homophobic and tied to traditional gender roles.
We also attended Graduate School in record numbers and became doctors, scientists, engineers, teachers, professors, social workers, journalists, etc. We made enormous strides in medicine, pharmacology, technology and engineering.
We spent our more lavish incomes on larger homes, luxury cars, and for a time in the 80s, on Rolexes. But we also invested heavily in our children’s educations and recreation.
Brokaw is only 6 years older than the oldest Boomers. He might have looked in the mirror for this report or at least re-read his book, “2007 Boom!: Voices of the Sixties Personal Reflections on the '60s and Today”. His college and young adult years were in the 60s and he describes participating in many of the same phenomenon as us Boomers. He did not come across as sanctimonious as he did in this broadcast. He projects himself as very ethical and principled and I am not suggesting otherwise. But, he has enjoyed great financial success, way beyond most Boomers; and he has made the necessary compromises to achieve that success. For someone who believes he is a journalist, he has managed to have an entire career without offending anyone. I do not how any real, truth-seeking, journalist could avoid offending the powerful. He also reveals in the book a remarkably close social relationship with many of his news subjects. A number of well-known journalists and editors have always followed a policy of avoiding socializing with any of the people that could be their subjects.
Watching the Academy Awards a few nights later also reminded me that a generation that may have a self-indulgent need for self-expression has produced so many film-makers, many of whom communicate important messages. Likewise, Rock and Roll is alive and well and many of the artists who spoke for our generation have withstood the test of time and speak to and for our children.
So yes, it is disappointing that more of our dreams in the late 60s and early 70s have not been realized. But we have made important incremental progress on many fronts and have every reason to believe that our children will make further progress.
Interesting blog, Mark. Brokaw’s Boomer$ was an embarrassing failure for CNBC. By ignoring the growing consensus among actual experts that there were two distinct generations born in the post-WWII boom in births, the show was a mess of confusion and inaccuracy.
ReplyDeleteMost people born 1946-1964 (which the show defines as the Baby Boom Generation) who watched this show would not have related to it. This is because practically the whole show described those born in the first half of that period (the real Boomer Generation) while almost completely ignoring those born in the second half (Generation Jones). And far more babies were born during the GenJones years, which makes the fundamental idiocy of this show that much more pronounced.
The images of childhood presented were almost all those of the real Boomers: Coonskin hats, hula hoops, Howdy Doody, school bomb drills, ovaltine, etc., etc. Most Jonesers weren’t even born then. Where was the Brady Bunch and Partridge Family, Easy Bake Ovens and Beany Coptors, etc. etc. which Jonesers grew up with? The teen/young adult years presented were those of the real Boomers: Vietnam and anti-war protests, Woodstock and hippy counterculture. But Jonesers were just little kids then, not a part of any of that. Where were GenJones teen cultural touchstones like disco and heavy metal, Farah Fawcett and David Cassidy posters?
The show was filled with contradictions. It referred to Obama as a Boomer. But this was the same network that kept talking about the generational change at last year’s Inaugural. So the Boomers were passing the generational torch to the…Boomers?! The show repeatedly stated that the Boomers were the offspring of the Greatest (WWII) Generation. Does that mean the Silent Generation (between the WWII Gen and Boomers) didn’t have any children? In reality, most Jonesers were born to Silent Gen parents. This is one of many reasons why Jonesers are so different than Boomers, since experts emphzsize the big contrast between the Silent gen vs. the WWII Gen and parental influences are so crucial to the formation of generational personalities.
For our entire life cycle, we Jonesers have been mistakenly lumped in with the Boomers (and blamed for their excesses), while getting very few of the benefits. We are not Boomers. Every national poll on this question confirms that we don’t believe we are Boomers. Mountains of data confirm the clear differences in values, attitudes, etc. between Boomers and Jonesers. Most actual experts believe GenJones exists. Yet, CNBC ignores this and puts out this show using that old widely-discredited 1946-1964 Boomer definition.
Generations are a function of the common formative experiences of its members, not the fertility rates of its parents. There was a demographic baby boom 1946-1964, but the Boomer Generation was born around 1942-1953, while GenJones was born around 1954-1965. This is what actual experts say, as opposed to clueless media companies who don’t bother to research current expert opinion.
Thankfully, many in the media have paid attention to the experts, and GenJones has been getting lots of media attention. Many major mainstream media companies now use the term; in fact, the Associated Press' annual Trend Report chose the Rise of Generation Jones as the #1 trend of 2009. We Jonesers need to help spread awareness about our long-lost generation to help avoid the imbecility of shows like Brokaw’s Boomer$.
Here are some of the good links about GenJones I found:
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20090127/column27_st.art.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ta_Du5K0jk
http://generationjones.com/2009latest.html
Thanks for your comments. I am a real Boomer so Davy Crockett and Howdy Doody were definitely part of my childhood!
ReplyDelete